> Out of curiosity, did you ever (even think to) click on the "Get Started" links? Our goal was that end users would click that and then click the giant red button we put on that page.
#Bulkr pro tpb code#
It's great that I can host photos on my own storage and that the code is on github and that the API is well-documented and hey it got started on Kickstarter!īut where's the beef? What do I get in a tangible way for signing up? Which leads us into. Intellectually I had a fairly good idea that that was what was on offer, from reading through the high-level info and the REST API, but there's really nothing that spells that out in a concrete way for non-developer end-users.
> Basically, imagine if you could use something as awesome as Flickr but have the photos stored in your personal Dropbox account or S3 bucket. It looks great, but at no point does it clearly communicate to me what it is their product does. Their website is like a case-study in what not to do. Presumably, then OpenPhoto lets me collect said photos into galleries and hosts the gallery bits? If so, why doesn't the word gallery appear anywhere on their site? Why isn't there any way to explore the galleries that they are hosting right now? Do I have to create an account to even see them? Would people I want to share with need to? Why aren't there some screenshots of what these galleries look like? Does the absence of all of this information mean that it doesn't actually handle the gallery bits? If that's the case, what does it do?
#Bulkr pro tpb software#
I don't need special software to hand links to files on S3 out to others, or display the files on my own site in galleries I build myself. Like, I don't need special software to store photos on S3. So I've spent like ten minutes clicking around the OpenPhoto site, and it seems to me that they somehow forgot to mention what it is that OpenPhoto actually does. Flickr is great for both, too bad that Yahoo is killing it. I'm only interested in storing those pictures somewhere in case I need a backup or in case I want to access them from a remote location. Personally I'm not interested in showing off my work to the world. Also 1 TB of pictures would cost on Google $256 per year, while on S3 it would be $1720 per year.
You can purchase 80 GB of storage for $20 per year, or $1.6 per month. The only cheap alternative to Flickr would be Google's Picassa. I'm also starting to make movies, so I'm sure my collection will double in size pretty soon. Managing it, like uploading new ones or deleting from it would also bring additional costs. On Amazon S3 that would cost me $4.48 per month just for the storage. Also my collection is growing like crazy ever since I became a father.
#Bulkr pro tpb full#
Well, I'm sure there are limits, but I uploaded 8,000 full resolution pictures on it in only a couple of days and it didn't complain. With a Flickr Pro account, for $2 per month you can upload an unlimited number of photos. The problem is hosting your photos with OpenPhotoProject would cost more. We do enforce this rule to the best of our ability." If your photos would only be suited for adult sites, adult magazines, or R-rated movies, they are not suitable for Smugmug.” The summary line is as follows: “we prohibit the uploading and display of photographs or other Media portraying explicit nudity that would be unacceptable in a public museum where minors visit, for example.
"Our nudity policy is pretty simple and written in plain English. We’re a family safe site, and we will ask you to take down any photos that violate our terms of use." "I’m afraid if you’re a nude photographer, SmugMug isn’t the place for you. (this is the relevant section from their TOS: "By using any Interactive Areas, you agree not to post, upload to, transmit, distribute, store, create or otherwise publish through the Site any of the following:Īny photograph, video, message, data, information, text, music, sound, graphics, code or other material ("Content") that is unlawful, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, indecent, lewd, suggestive, harassing, threatening, invasive of privacy or publicity rights, abusive, inflammatory, fraudulent or otherwise objectionable or harmful, including without limitation photographs or other Content containing nudity that would be unacceptable in a public museum where minors visit ")Įdit: It's also not hard to find them discussing their policy, like the customer reps on their public blog. There's no value for me in paying money for a service which requires I lock up my photographs like Fort Knox merely because they contain skin. It's possible to slip some things through the cracks, but if and when they're found they'll delist the photos.
#Bulkr pro tpb password#
They'll allow that kind of content only in non-public galleries that are also password protected.
0 kommentar(er)
